Paper detail

Low-lying baryon masses using twisted mass fermions ensembles at the physical pion mass

We investigate the low-lying baryon spectrum using three $N_f$=2+1+1 ensembles simulated with physical values of the quark masses and lattice spacings of 0.080, 0.069, and 0.057 fm. The ensembles are generated using twisted mass clover-improved fermions and the Iwasaki gauge action. The spatial length is kept approximately the same at about 5.1 fm to 5.5 fm fulfilling the condition $m_πL$> 3.6. We investigate isospin splitting within isospin multiples and verify that for most cases the isospin splitting for these lattice spacing is consistent with zero. In the couple of cases, for which there is a non-zero value, in the continuum limit, the mass splitting goes to zero. The baryon masses are extrapolated to the continuum limit using the three $N_f$=2+1+1 ensembles and are compared to other recent lattice QCD results. For the strange and charm quark masses, we find, respectively, $m_s$(2 GeV)=99.2(2.7) MeV and $m_c$(3 GeV)=1.015(39) GeV. The values predicted for the masses of the doubly charmed $Ξ_{cc}^\star$, $Ω_{cc}$ and $Ω_{cc}^\star$ baryons are 3.676(55) GeV, 3.703(51) GeV and 3.803(50) GeV, respectively, and for the triply charmed $Ω_{ccc}$ baryon is 4.785(71) GeV.

preprint2024arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.