Paper detail

Low-Luminosity GRB 060218: A Collapsar Jet from a Neutron Star, Leaving a Magnetar as a Remnant?

The gamma-ray burst (GRB) 060218 has ~ 10^5 times lower luminosity than typical long GRBs, and is associated with a supernova (SN). The radio afterglow displays no jet break, so that this burst might arise from a mildly-relativistic spherical outflow produced by the SN shock sweeping the stellar surface. Since this model is energetically difficult, we propose that the radio afterglow is produced by a non-relativistic phase of an initially collimated outflow (jet). Our jet model is supported by the detection of optical linear polarization in the SN component. We also show analytically that the jet can penetrate a progenitor star. We analyzed the observational data of the prompt emission of this burst and obtained a smooth power-law light curve which might last longer than 10^6s. This behavior contrasts with the long intermittent activities with the X-ray flares of typical GRBs, implying that the central engine of this burst is different from those of typical GRBs. This argument is consistent with the analysis of the SN component of this burst, which suggests that the progenitor star was less massive and collapsed to a neutron star instead of a black hole. The collimation-corrected event rate of such low-luminosity GRBs is estimated to be ~ 10 times higher than that of typical long GRBs, and they might form a different GRB population: low-luminosity GRBs are produced by mildly-relativistic jets from neutron stars at the collapses of massive stars, while typical long GRBs by highly-relativistic jets from black holes. We suggest that the central engine of GRB 060218 is a pulsar (or a magnetar) with the initial rotation period P_0 \~ 10ms and the magnetic field B ~ 10^16G. A giant flare from the magnetar might be observed in future.

preprint2007arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.