Paper detail

Low-ionization pairs of knots in planetary nebulae: physical properties and excitation

We obtained optical long-slit spectra of four planetary nebulae (PNe) with low-ionization pair of knots, namely He 1-1, IC 2149, KjPn 8 and NGC 7662. These data allow us to derive the physical parameters and excitation of the pairs of knots, and those of higher ionization inner components of the nebulae, separately. Our results are as follows. 1) The electron temperatures of the knots are within the range 9500 to 14500 K, similar to the temperatures of the higher ionization rims/shells. 2) Typical knots' densities are 500 to 2000 cm^{-3}. 3) Empirical densities of the inner rims/shells are higher than those of the pairs of knots, by up to a factor of 10. Theoretical predictions, at variance with the empirical results, suggest that knots should be denser than the inner regions, by at least a factor of 10. 4) Empirical and theoretical density contrasts can be reconciled if we assume that at least 90% of the knots' gas is neutral (likely composed of dust and molecules). 5) By using Raga et al. (2008) shock modeling and diagnostic diagrams appropriated for spatially resolved PNe, we suggest that high-velocity shocked knots traveling in the photoionized outer regions of PNe can explain the emission of the pairs of knots analysed in this paper.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.