Paper detail

Low Energy Spectral Index and $E_{p}$ evolution of Quasi-thermal Photosphere Emission of Gamma-Ray Bursts

Recent observations by the Fermi satellite suggest that a photosphere emission component is contributing to the observed spectrum of many GRBs. One important question is whether the photosphere component can interpret the typical ``Band'' function of GRBs with a typical low energy photon spectral index $α\sim -1$. We perform a detailed study of the photosphere emission spectrum by progressively introducing several physical ingredients previously not fully incorporated, including the probability distribution of the location of a dynamically evolving photosphere, superposition of emission from an equal-arrival-time ``volume'' in a continuous wind, the evolution of optical depth of a wind with finite but evolving outer boundary, as well as the effect of different top-hat wind luminosity ($L_w$) profiles. By assuming a co-moving blackbody spectrum emerging from the photosphere, we find that for an outflow with a constant or increasing $L_w$, the low-energy spectrum below the peak energy ($E_{p}$), can be modified to $F_ν\sim ν^{1.5}$ ($α\sim +0.5$). A softer ($-1<α<+0.5$) or flat ($α=-1$) spectrum can be obtained during the $L_w$ decreasing phase or high-latitude-emission-dominated phase. We also study the evolution of $E_{p}$ as a function of wind and photosphere luminosity in this photosphere model. An $E_p-L$ tracking pattern can be reproduced if a certain positive dependence between the dimensionless entropy $η$ and $L_w$ is introduced. However, the hard-to-soft evolution pattern cannot be reproduced unless a contrived condition is invoked. In order to interpret the Band spectrum, a more complicated photosphere model or a different energy dissipation and radiation mechanism are needed.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.