Paper detail

Low-energy probes of small CMB amplitude in models of radiative Higgs mechanism

The small CMB amplitude $A_s \simeq 10^{-9}$ (or, small temperature fluctuation $δT/T \simeq 10^{-5}$) typically requires an unnaturally small effective coupling of an inflaton $λ_ϕ\sim 10^{-14}$. In successful models, there usually is extra suppression of the amplitude, e.g. by large-field inflaton with non-minimal coupling $ξ$, so that $λ_ϕ$ can be much larger. But $λ_ϕ$ and $ξ$ cannot be $\sim {\cal O}(1)$ simultaneously; the naturalness burden is shared between them. We show that the absence of new physics signals at TeV scale may prefer a more natural size of $ξ\lesssim {\cal O}(1-100)$ with $λ_ϕ\lesssim {\cal O}(10^{-4}-10^{-8})$, constraining larger $ξ$ with larger $λ_ϕ$ more strongly. This intriguing connection between low- and high-energy physics is made in the scenarios with $U(1)_X$ where inflaton's renormalization running also induces Coleman-Weinberg mechanism for the electroweak symmetry breaking. We particularly work out the prospects of LHC 13 and 100 TeV $pp$ colliders for probing the parameter space of the small CMB amplitude.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.