Paper detail

Low energy kinetic distribution on orbifolds

Fermion self-energy associated with wave function renormalization is studied in a five-dimensional Yukawa theory on the orbifold S1/Z2. One-loop divergence can be subtracted with only two renormalization constants in the bulk and on the branes. We show that the bulk and brane parts of the self-energy are uniquely determined with requiring physical conditions. With this procedure, momentum-scale dependence of the renormalized self-energy is given and the distribution of the bulk and brane parts can be found at low and high energies. Despite possible higher degrees of divergence in higher dimensions, the regularization scheme dependence does not arise. A viewpoint of the regularization scheme dependence at higher-loop level is also discussed. We find that the ratio of the bulk contribution to the brane contribution depends on the momentum scale in a very mild way, so that the relative coefficient of bulk and brane kinetic terms can be regarded as approximately constant for the leading quantum effect. The physical conditions given here are applicable to remove ambiguity in various orbifold models.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.