Paper detail

Low energy implications of cosmological data in $U(1)_X$ Higgs inflation

A scalar field having the Coleman-Weinberg type effective potential arises in various contexts of particle physics and serves as a useful framework for discussing cosmic inflation. According to recent studies based on the Markov chain Monte Carlo analysis, the coefficients of such an effective potential are severely constrained by the cosmological data. We investigate the impact of this observation on the physics beyond the Standard Model, focusing on an inflationary model based on the $U(1)_X$-extended Standard Model as a well-motivated example. We examine the parameter region that is not excluded by the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) Run-2 at 139 fb${}^{-1}$ integrated luminosity, and show that the model parameters can be further constrained by the High-Luminosity LHC experiments in the near future. We also comment on the possible reheating mechanism and the dark matter candidates of this scenario.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.