Paper detail

Low-Complexity Decoder for Overloaded Uniquely Decodable Synchronous CDMA

We consider the problem of designing a low-complexity decoder for antipodal uniquely decodable (UD) /errorless code sets for overloaded synchronous code-division multiple access (CDMA) systems, where the number of signals Kamax is the largest known for the given code length L. In our complexity analysis, we illustrate that compared to maximum-likelihood (ML) decoder, which has an exponential computational complexity for even moderate code lengths, the proposed decoder has a quasi-quadratic computational complexity. Simulation results in terms of bit-error-rate (BER) demonstrate that the performance of the proposed decoder has only a 1-2 dB degradation in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at a BER of 10^-3 when compared to ML. Moreover, we derive the proof of the minimum Manhattan distance of such UD codes and we provide the proofs for the propositions; these proofs constitute the foundation of the formal proof for the maximum number users Kamax for L=8 .

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.