Lovàsz's hom-counting theorem by inclusion-exclusion principle

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Abstract

Let C{\mathcal C} be the category of finite graphs. Lovàsz (1967) shows that if ∣Hom(X,A)∣=∣Hom(X,B)∣|\mathrm{Hom}(X,A)|=|\mathrm{Hom}(X,B)| holds for any XX, then AA is isomorphic to BB. Pultr (1973) gives a categorical generalization using a similar argument. Both proofs assume that each object has a finite number of isomorphism classes of subobjects. Generalizations without this assumption are given by Dawar, Jakl, and Reggio (2021) and Regio (2021). Here another generalization without this assumption is given, with a shorter proof. Examples of categories are given, for which our theorem is applicable, but the existing theorems are not.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.