Paper detail

Lossy Compression with Privacy Constraints: Optimality of Polar Codes

A lossy source coding problem with privacy constraint is studied in which two correlated discrete sources $X$ and $Y$ are compressed into a reconstruction $\hat{X}$ with some prescribed distortion $D$. In addition, a privacy constraint is specified as the equivocation between the lossy reconstruction $\hat{X}$ and $Y$. This models the situation where a certain amount of source information from one user is provided as utility (given by the fidelity of its reconstruction) to another user or the public, while some other correlated part of the source information $Y$ must be kept private. In this work, we show that polar codes are able, possibly with the aid of time sharing, to achieve any point in the optimal rate-distortion-equivocation region identified by Yamamoto, thus providing a constructive scheme that obtains the optimal tradeoff between utility and privacy in this framework.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.