Paper detail

Losses in Monolayer Graphene Nanoresonators due to Joule Dissipation Caused by Synthetic Electric Fields and the ways of Joule Losses Minimizations

We consider losses in monolayer graphene nanoresonator connected with Joule dissipation (heating) caused by valley currents stipulated by synthetic electric fields . These synthetic electric fields arise in graphene membrane due to periodic in time gauge fields generated there by external periodic electromotive force. This mechanism accounts for essential part (about 40 percents) of losses in graphene nanoresonator and is specific just for graphene. The ways of the minimization of these Joule dissipation (increase of the quality-factor of the electromechanical system) are discussed. It is explained why one can increase quality-factor by correctly chosen combination of strains (by strain engineering). Besides it is shown that quality-factor can be increased by switching on a magnetic field perpendicular to graphene membrane.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.