Paper detail

Loss Tomography in General Topology

Although there are a few works reported in the literature considering loss tomography in the general topology, there is few well established result since all of them rely either on simulations or on experiments that have many random factors affecting the outcome. To improve the situation, we address a number of issues in this paper that include a maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) for the general topology, the statistical properties of the MLE, the statistical properties of a frequently referred estimator called the moving variance and weighted average (MVWA), and a renewed MVWA that removes the restriction of knowing variance in advance from the MVWA. The statistical properties covers minimum-variance unbiasedness, efficiency, and variances of the estimates obtained by the estimators. Given the properties, we can evaluate the estimators without the need of simulations. To verify the properties, a simulation study is conducted that confirms the accuracy of the findings.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.