Loss of double-integral character during relaxation

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Abstract

We provide explicit examples to show that the relaxation of functionals Lp(Ω;Rm)∋u↦∫Ω∫ΩW(u(x),u(y)) dx dy, L^p(Ω;\mathbb{R}^m) \ni u\mapsto \int_Ω\int_ΩW(u(x), u(y))\, dx\, dy, where Ω⊂RnΩ\subset\mathbb{R}^n is an open and bounded set, 1<p<∞1<p<\infty and W:Rm×Rm→RW:\mathbb{R}^m\times \mathbb{R}^m\to \mathbb{R} a suitable integrand, is in general not of double-integral form. This proves an up to now open statement in [Pedregal, Rev. Mat. Complut. 29 (2016)] and [Bellido & Mora-Corral, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 50 (2018)]. The arguments are inspired by recent results regarding the structure of (approximate) nonlocal inclusions, in particular, their invariance under diagonalization of the constraining set. For a complementary viewpoint, we also discuss a class of double-integral functionals for which relaxation is in fact structure preserving and the relaxed integrands arise from separate convexification.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.