Paper detail

Loss cone: past, present and future

The capture and subsequent in--spiral of compact stellar remnants by central massive black holes, is one of the more interesting likely sources of gravitational radiation detectable by LISA. The relevant stellar population includes stellar mass black holes, and possibly intermediate mass black holes, generally on initially eccentric orbits. Predicted detectable rates of capture are highly uncertain, but may be high enough that source confusion is an issue. Foreground events with relatively high signal-to-noise ratio may provide important tests of general relativity. I review the rate estimates in the literature, and the apparent discrepancy between different authors' estimates, and discuss some of the relevant uncertainties and physical processes. The white dwarf mergers rate are uncertain by a factor of few; the neutron star merger rate is completely uncertain and likely to be small; the black hole merger rate is likely to be dominant for detectable mergers and is uncertain by at least two orders of magnitude, largely due to unknown physical conditions and processes. The primary difference in rate estimates is due to different initial conditions and less directly due to different estimates of key physical processes, assumed in different model scenarios for in-spiral and capture.

preprint2003arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.