Paper detail

Lorentzian Peak Sharpening and Sparse Blind Source Separation for NMR Spectroscopy

In this paper, we introduce a preprocessing technique for blind source separation (BSS) of nonnegative and overlapped data. For Nuclear Magnetic Resonance spectroscopy (NMR), the classical method of Naanaa and Nuzillard (NN) requires the condition that source signals to be non-overlapping at certain locations while they are allowed to overlap with each other elsewhere. NN's method works well with data signals that possess stand alone peaks (SAP). The SAP does not hold completely for realistic NMR spectra however. Violation of SAP often introduces errors or artifacts in the NN's separation results. To address this issue, a preprocessing technique is developed here based on Lorentzian peak shapes and weighted peak sharpening. The idea is to superimpose the original peak signal with its weighted negative second order derivative. The resulting sharpened (narrower and taller) peaks enable NN's method to work with a more relaxed SAP condition, the so called dominant peaks condition (DPS), and deliver improved results. To achieve an optimal sharpening while preserving the data nonnegativity, we prove the existence of an upper bound of the weight parameter and propose a selection criterion. Numerical experiments on NMR spectroscopy data show satisfactory performance of our proposed method.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.