Paper detail

Lorentz violation and noncommutative effect on superradiance scattering off Kerr-like black hole and on the shadow of it

We consider a Lorentz violating non-commutating Kerr-like spacetime and studied the superradiance effect and the shadow cast by the back hole. We extensively study the different aspects of the black hole associated with a generalized Kerr-like spacetime metric endowed with the corrections licked with Lorentz violation and non-commutativity effect jointly. We investigate the superradiance effect, deviation of shape, and size of the ergosphere, energy emission rate, and black hole shadow in this generalized situation and study their variation taking different admissible values of Lorentz violating parameter $l$ and non-commutative parameter $b$. The admissible range has been determined from the observation of the Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) collaboration concerning $M87_8$ astronomical black hole. We observe that the superradiance phenomena has a crucially depends on the parameter $l$ and $b$ apart from its dependence on $a$ which is linked to the spin of the black hole. We also observe that with the increase in Lorentz violating parameter $l$, the size of the black hole shadow increases, and with the increase in the non-commutative parameter $b$, the size of the black hole decreases. We have made an attempt to constrain parameters $b$ of a non-commutative Kerr-like black hole using the observation available from the EHT collaboration, in the same way, we put constrain on the Lorentz violating parameter $l$. This study shows that black holes associated with non-commutative Kerr-like spacetime may be a suitable candidate for an astrophysical black hole.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.