Paper detail

Lorentz factor - Beaming Corrected Energy/Luminosity Correlations and GRB Central Engine Models

We work on a GRB sample whose initial Lorentz factors ($Γ_0$) are constrained with the afterglow onset method and the jet opening angles ($θ_{\rm j}$) are determined by the jet break time. We confirm the $Γ_0$ - $E_{γ,\rm iso}$ correlation by Liang et al. (2010), and the $Γ_0$ - $L_{γ,\rm iso}$ correlation by L{ü} et al. (2012). Furthermore, we find correlations between $Γ_0$ and the beaming corrected $γ$-ray energy ($E_γ$) and mean $γ$-ray luminosity ($L_γ$). By also including the kinetic energy of the afterglow, we find rough correlations (with larger scatter) between $Γ_0$ and the total ($γ$-ray plus kinetic) energy and the total mean luminosity, both for isotropic values and beaming corrected values: these correlations allow us to test the data with GRB central engine models. Limiting our sample to the GRBs that likely have a black hole central engine, we compare the data with theoretical predictions of two types of jet launching mechanisms from BHs, i.e. the non-magnetized $ν\barν$ - annihilation mechanism, and the strongly magnetized Blandford-Znajek (BZ) mechanism. We find that the data are more consistent with the latter mechanism, and discuss the implications of our findings for GRB jet composition.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.