Paper detail

Lopsided galactic disks in IllustrisTNG

A significant fraction of nearby late-type galaxies are lopsided. We study the asymmetry of the stellar component in a sample of well-resolved disky galaxies selected from the last snapshot of the Illustris TNG100 simulation based on their flatness and rotational support. Among 1912 disks, we identify 161 objects with significant asymmetry in terms of the m=1 Fourier mode of the stellar component within (1-2) stellar half-mass radii and describe their properties using three representative examples. The profiles of the m=1 mode typically increase with radius, and the corresponding phase is constant in the asymmetric region, signifying a global distortion. Following the evolution of the lopsided disks over time, we find that their history is rather uneventful and the occurrence of the asymmetry is fairly recent. Only about 1/3 of the lopsided disks experienced any strong interaction recently that could have led to the distortion of their shape: 24% were affected by a more massive object and 9% underwent a gas-rich merger. Still, a majority of lopsided disks show a significant increase in their recent star formation rate. The most frequent mechanism for the formation of lopsided disks thus seems to be asymmetric star formation probably related to gas accretion, although the distortions in the gas and stars are not strongly correlated. This picture is supported by the finding that the lopsided population on average contains more gas, has higher star formation rate, lower metallicity and bluer color than the remaining disks. These correlations are similar to those seen in real galaxies, even though the fraction of simulated lopsided disks (8%) is much lower than in observations (30%). The observed correlation between the presence of the asymmetry and a bar is not reproduced either. These discrepancies may be due to overquenching or insufficient resolution of IllustrisTNG simulations.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.