Paper detail

Loopy annealing belief propagation for vertex cover and matching: convergence, LP relaxation, correctness and Bethe approximation

For the minimum cardinality vertex cover and maximum cardinality matching problems, the max-product form of belief propagation (BP) is known to perform poorly on general graphs. In this paper, we present an iterative loopy annealing BP (LABP) algorithm which is shown to converge and to solve a Linear Programming relaxation of the vertex cover or matching problem on general graphs. LABP finds (asymptotically) a minimum half-integral vertex cover (hence provides a 2-approximation) and a maximum fractional matching on any graph. We also show that LABP finds (asymptotically) a minimum size vertex cover for any bipartite graph and as a consequence compute the matching number of the graph. Our proof relies on some subtle monotonicity arguments for the local iteration. We also show that the Bethe free entropy is concave and that LABP maximizes it. Using loop calculus, we also give an exact (also intractable for general graphs) expression of the partition function for matching in term of the LABP messages which can be used to improve mean-field approximations.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author7 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.