Paper detail

Looking at the relation between haloes and galaxies under the lens

We use an empirical approach to model the stellar mass of galaxies according to their host dark-matter haloes and subhaloes ('HASH'), where each galaxy resides in a subhalo taken from a large N-body cosmological simulation. This approach allows us to study the mass relation between subhaloes and galaxies (MR) using: the weak lensing signal (WL), the two point auto-correlation function (CF), and the stellar mass function of galaxies (SMF). Our method is based on modeling the lensing signal directly from the cosmological simulation, and should thus be more accurate than other methods based on analytic halo models. We find that the WL does not provide a strong constraint on the MR, allowing for more than a factor of 10 freedom in the subhalo mass of central galaxies, for a given stellar mass. The freedom for satellite galaxies is much larger, providing a very poor constraint on the fraction of satellite galaxies (0.05-0.8). These results are not significantly modified when using both the SMF and WL as constraints. We show that for the most massive galaxies, observational constraints based on the CF with 0.1 dex errors, are equivalent to 0.05 dex error in the WL. For intermediate and low mass galaxies the WL and CF constrain the MR in a different way. Although the WL is currently not adding much information at these masses, it has the potential of being important using future, more accurate measurements. The models found here do not match simultaneously the observed CF and WL signals, and show a limited ability to match the WL & SMF. We suspect that this is partially due to the cosmological model assumed here and we therefore adopt a mock WL signal through most of this work. In comparison to previous models in the literature, the method presented here is probably more general, as it reveals a larger range of solutions for a given set of observational constraints [abridged].

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.