Paper detail

Longitudinal abnormalities in white matter extracellular free water volume fraction and neuropsychological functioning in patients with traumatic brain injury

Traumatic brain injury is a global public health problem associated with chronic neurological complications and long-term disability. Biomarkers that map onto the underlying brain pathology driving these complications are urgently needed to identify individuals at risk for poor recovery and to inform design of clinical trials of neuroprotective therapies. Neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration are two endophenotypes associated with increases in brain extracellular water content after trauma. The objective of this study was to describe the relationship between a neuroimaging biomarker of extracellular free water content and the clinical features of patients with traumatic brain injury. We analyzed a cohort of 64 adult patients requiring hospitalization for non-penetrating traumatic brain injury of all severities as well as 32 healthy controls. Patients underwent brain MRI and clinical neuropsychological assessment in the subacute (2-weeks) and chronic (6-months) post-injury period, and controls underwent a single MRI. For each subject, we derived a summary score representing deviations in whole brain white matter (1) extracellular free water volume fraction (VF) and (2) free water-corrected fractional anisotropy (fw-FA). The summary specific anomaly score (SAS) for VF was significantly higher in TBI patients in the subacute and chronic post-injury period relative to controls. SAS for VF significantly correlated with neuropsychological functioning in the subacute, but not chronic post-injury period. These findings indicate abnormalities in whole brain white matter extracellular water fraction in patients with TBI and are an important step toward identifying and validating noninvasive biomarkers that map onto the pathology driving disability after TBI.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access11 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.