Paper detail

Long term optical variability of bright X-ray point sources in elliptical galaxies

We present long term optical variability studies of bright X-ray sources in four nearby elliptical galaxies with {\it Chandra} Advanced CCD Imaging Spectrometer array (ACIS-S) and {\it Hubble Space Telescope (HST)} Advanced Camera for Surveys observations. Out of the 46 bright (X-ray counts $> 60$) sources that are in the common field of view of the {\it Chandra} and {\it HST} observations, 34 of them have potential optical counterparts, while the rest of them are optically dark. After taking into account of systematic errors, estimated using the field optical sources as reference, we find that four of the X-ray sources (three in NGC1399 and one in NGC1427) have variable optical counterparts at a high significance level. The X-ray luminosities of these source are $\sim 10^{38}$ $\rm ergs~s^{-1}$ and are also variable on similar time-scales. The optical variability implies that the optical emission is associated with the X-ray source itself rather than being the integrated light from a host globular cluster. For one source the change in optical magnitude is $> 0.3$, which is one of the highest reported for this class of X-ray sources and this suggests that the optical variability is induced by the X-ray activity. However, the optically variable sources in NGC1399 have been reported to have blue colours ($g - z > 1$). All four sources have been detected in the infra-red (IR) by {\it Spitzer} as point sources, and their ratio of $5.8$ to $3.6 μm$ flux are $> 0.63$ indicating that their IR spectra are like those of Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN). While spectroscopic confirmation is required, it is likely that all four sources are background AGNs. We find none of the X-ray sources having optical/IR colours different from AGNs, to be optically variable.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.