Paper detail

Long-Term Monitoring of the Black Hole Candidate Swift J1753.5-0127 with INTEGRAL/SPI

The black hole candidate Swift J1753.5-0127 went into outburst in 2005 June. Rather than fade into quiescence as most black-hole-candidate transients do, it has remained in a low hard spectral state for most of the $\sim$ 9 years after outburst. The persistent emission while in a hard state is reminiscent of the black hole Cyg X-1 and the black hole candidates 1E 1740.7-2942 and GRS 1758-258. Thus far hard X-ray/soft gamma-ray results have focused mainly on the 2005 flare, with a few additional observations during 2007. Here, we present results from INTEGRAL/SPI observations from 2005 - 2010 spanning the 22 - 650 keV energy range. Spectral analysis shows a weak high-energy excess ( $\sim$ 2.9 $σ$) above a cutoff powerlaw model that is well fit by a powerlaw suggesting an additional spectral component. Observations of Cyg X-1, 1E 1740.7-2942, and GRS 1758-258 have shown similar spectra requiring an additional high-energy component The SPI results are compared to previously reported results for Swift J1753.5-0127 as well as observations of other sources.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.