Paper detail

Long-term continuous assessment of SRAM PUF and source of random numbers

The qualities of Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) suffer from several noticeable degradations due to silicon aging. In this paper, we investigate the long-term effects of silicon aging on PUFs derived from the start-up behavior of Static Random Access Memories (SRAM). Previous research on SRAM aging is based on transistor-level simulation or accelerated aging test at high temperature and voltage to observe aging effects within a short period of time. In contrast, we have run a long-term continuous power-up test on 16 Arduino Leonardo boards under nominal conditions for two years. In total, we collected around 175 million measurements for reliability, uniqueness and randomness evaluations. Analysis shows that the number of bits that flip with respect to the reference increased by 19.3% while min-entropy of SRAM PUF noise improves by 19.3% on average after two years of aging. The impact of aging on reliability is smaller under nominal conditions than was previously assessed by the accelerated aging test. The test we conduct in this work more closely resembles the conditions of a device in the field, and therefore we more accurately evaluate how silicon aging affects SRAM PUFs.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.