Paper detail

Long-range parity non-conserving electron-nucleon interaction

As known, electron vacuum polarization by nuclear Coulomb field produces Uehling potential with the range $\hbar/2m_e c$. Similarly, neutrino vacuum polarization by $Z$ boson field produces long range potential $\sim G^2/r^5$ with the large range $\hbar/2m_νc$. Attempts to measure parity-conserving part of this potential produced only limits on this potential which are several orders of magnitude higher than the standard model predictions. We show that parity non-conserving (PNC) part of the neutrino exchange potential $W_L(r)$ gives a significant fraction of the observed PNC effects. Mixed $Z-γ$ electron vacuum polarization produces PNC potential with range $\hbar/2m_e c$, which exceeds the range of the weak interaction by five orders of magnitude. We calculate contribution of the long-range PNC potentials to the nuclear spin independent and nuclear spin dependent PNC effects. The cases of the single-isotope PNC effects and the ratio of PNC effects in different isotopes are considered for Ca, Cs, Ba, Sm, Dy, Yb, Hg, Tl, Pb, Bi, Fr, Ra atoms and ions. Contributions of the long-range PNC potentials ($\sim$1\%) significantly exceed experimental error (0.35\%) for PNC effect in Cs.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.