Paper detail

Long paths and connectivity in {$1$}-independent random graphs

Given a graph $G$, a probability measure $μ$ on the subsets of the edge set of $G$ is said to be $1$-independent if events determined by edge sets that are at graph distance at least $1$ apart in $G$ are independent. Call such a probability measure a $1$-ipm on $G$, and denote by $\mathbf{G}_μ$ the associated random spanning subgraph of $G$. Let $\mathcal{M}_{1,\geqslant p}(G)$ (resp. $\mathcal{M}_{1,\leqslant p}(G)$) denote the collection of $1$-ipms $μ$ on $G$ for which each edge is included in $\mathbf{G}_μ$ with probability at least $p$ (resp. at most $p$). Let $\mathbb{Z}^2$ denote the square integer lattice. Balister and Bollobás raised the question of determining the critical value $p_{\star}=p_{1,c}(\mathbb{Z}^2)$ such that for all $p>p_{\star}$ and all $μ\in \mathcal{M}_{1,\geqslant p}(\mathbb{Z}^2)$, $\left(\mathbf{\mathbb{Z}^2}\right)_μ$ almost surely contains an infinite component. This can be thought of as asking for a $1$-independent analogue of the celebrated Harris--Kesten theorem. In this paper we investigate both this problem and connectivity problems for $1$-ipms more generally. We give two lower bounds on $p_{\star}$ that significantly improve on the previous bounds. Furthermore, motivated by the Russo--Seymour--Welsh lemmas, we define a $1$-independent critical probability for long paths and determine its value for the line and ladder lattices. Finally, for finite graphs $G$ we study $f_{1,G}(p)$ (respectively $F_{1,G}(p)$), the infimum (resp. supremum) over all $μ\in \mathcal{M}_{1,\geqslant p}(G)$ (resp. all $μ\in \mathcal{M}_{1,\leqslant p}(G)$) of the probability that $\mathbf{G}_μ$ is connected. We determine $f_{1,G}(p)$ and $F_{1,G}(p)$ exactly when $G$ is a path, a complete graph and a cycle of length at most $5$. Many new problems arise from our work, which are discussed in the final section of the paper.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.