Paper detail

Long GRBs and massive stellar explosions from frame dragging around rotating black holes

The most energetic GRB-supernovae probably derive from rotating stellar mass black holes. Based on BeppoSax data, we identify a mechanism for exploding a remnant stellar envelope by disk winds. A specific signature is high frequency modulations in the accompanying prompt GRB emission from dissipation in high energy emissions along the black hole spin axis due, in part, to forced turbulence in the inner disk or torus mediated by frame dragging. A majority of long GRBs are found to have significant autocorrelation below 10 Hz with chirps extending up to 1000 Hz. Their comoving Fourier spectra satisfy a power law with index $α\simeq-0.82$ up to about one hundred Hz and comoving chirp spectra show broken power laws with $α\simeq-0.65$ up to 10 Hz, $α\simeq-0.25$ up to a few hundred Hz and $α\simeq0$ beyond. These high frequency signatures are the most direct signature of long-lived turbulence down to the ISCO of rotating black holes, pointing directly accompanying long duration bursts in gravitational wave emission.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.