Paper detail

Long Duration X-Ray Flash and X-Ray Rich Gamma Ray Burst from Low Mass Population III Star

Recent numerical simulations suggest that Population III (Pop III) stars were born with masses not larger than $\sim 100 M_{\odot}$ but typically $\sim 40M_{\odot}$. By self-consistently considering the jet generation and propagation in the envelope of these low mass Pop III stars, we find that a Pop III blue super giant star has the possibility to raise a gamma-ray burst (GRB) even though it keeps a massive hydrogen envelope. We evaluate observational characters of Pop III GRBs and predict that Pop III GRBs have the duration of $\sim 10^5$ sec in the observer frame and the peak luminosity of $\sim 5 \times 10^{50} {\rm erg} {\rm sec}^{-1}$. Assuming that the $E_p-L_p$ (or $E_p-E_{γ, \rm iso}$) correlation holds for Pop III GRBs, we find that the spectrum peak energy falls $\sim$ a few keV (or $\sim 100$ keV) in the observer frame. We discuss the detectability of Pop III GRBs by future satellite missions such as EXIST and Lobster. If the $E_p-E_{γ, \rm iso}$ correlation holds, we have the possibility to detect Pop III GRBs at $z \sim 9$ as long duration X-ray rich GRBs by EXIST. On the other hand, if the $E_p-L_p$ correlation holds, we have the possibility to detect Pop III GRBs up to $z \sim 19$ as long duration X-ray flashes by Lobster.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.