Paper detail

London Penetration Depth and Pair Breaking

The London penetration depth is evaluated for isotropic materials for any transport and pair-breaking Born scattering rates. Besides known results, a number of new features are found. The slope $|dρ/dθ|$ of the normalized superfluid density $ρ=λ^2(0)/λ^2(θ)$ at the transition $θ=T/T_c=1$ has a minimum near the value of the pair-breaking parameter separating gapped and gapless states. The low-$T$ exponentially flat part of $ρ$ for the s-wave materials is suppressed by increasing pair breaking. For strong $T_c $ suppression by magnetic impurities the "Homes scaling" $λ^{-2}(0) \propto σT_c$ with $σ$ being the normal conductivity gives way to $λ^{-2}(0) \propto σT_c^2$. For the d-wave order parameter, the transport and spin-flip Born scattering rates enter the theory only as a sum, in particular, they affect the $T_c$ depression in the same manner. We confirm that the linear low temperature behavior of $ρ$ in a broad range of the combined scattering parameter turns to the $T^2$ behavior only when the critical temperature is suppressed at least by a factor of 3 relative to the clean limit $T_{c0}$. Moreover, in this range, $ρ(θ)$ is only weakly dependent on the scattering parameter, i.e. it is nearly universal.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.