Paper detail

Lojasiewicz inequalities and applications

In real algebraic geometry, Lojasiewicz's theorem asserts that any integral curve of the gradient flow of an analytic function that has an accumulation point has a unique limit. Lojasiewicz proved this result in the early 1960s as a consequence of his gradient inequality. Many problems in calculus of variations are questions about critical points or gradient flow lines of an infinite dimensional functional. Perhaps surprisingly, even blowups at singularities of many nonlinear PDE's can, in a certain sense, be thought of as limits of infinite dimensional gradient flows of analytic functionals. Thus, the question of uniqueness of blowups can be approached as an infinite dimensional version of Lojasiewicz's theorem. The question of uniqueness of blowups is perhaps the most fundamental question about singularities. This approach to uniqueness was pioneered by Leon Simon thirty years ago for the area functional and many related functionals using an elaborate reduction to a finite dimensional setting where Lojasiewicz's arguments applied. Recently, the authors proved two new infinite dimensional Lojasiewicz inequalities at noncompact singularities where it was well-known that a reduction to Lojasiewicz's arguments is not possible, but instead entirely new techniques are required. As a consequence, the authors settled a major long-standing open question about uniqueness of blowups for mean curvature flow at all generic singularities and for mean convex mean curvature flow at all singularities. Using this, the authors have obtained a rather complete description of the space-time singular set for MCF with generic singularities. In particular, the singular set of a MCF in $\bf{R}^{n+1}$ with only generic singularities is contained in finitely many compact Lipschitz submanifolds of dimension at most $n-1$ together with a set of dimension at most $n-2$.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.