Paper detail

Lognormality and oscillations in the coverage of high-throughput transcriptomic data towards gene ends

High-throughput transcriptomics experiments have reached the stage where the count of the number of reads alignable to a given position can be treated as an almost-continuous signal. This allows to ask questions of biophysical/biotechnical nature, but which may still have biological implications. Here we show that when sequencing RNA fragments from one end, as it is the case on most platforms, an oscillation in the read count is observed at the other end. We further show that these oscillations can be well described by Kolmogorov's 1941 broken stick model. We investigate how the model can be used to improve predictions of gene ends (3' transcript ends) but conclude that with present data the improvement is only marginal. The results highlight subtle effects in high-throughput transcriptomics experiments which do not have a biological origin, but which may still be used to obtain biological information.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.