Paper detail

Logical Construction of the Ionization Energy Theory and the Origin of Physical Categories

Logical proofs and definitions are developed to establish (i) the energy-level spacings, ξfor each chemical element (from the periodic table of chemical elements) can be converted to the ionization energies, (ii) both ξand the ionization energies are unique, and (iii) the averaged ionization energies of any quantum matter is proportional to the averaged ionization energies of its constituent chemical elements, if and only if ξnot = 0 and ξis not an irrelevant constant. Physical sets are then constructed such that they are members of a specific physical class where each class belongs to a specific physical category, P. However, there is not a single structure-preserving functor from one energy-level spacing physical category, P(ξ) to another P'(ξ). Therefore, the existence of many P(ξ) imply the existence of different categories of physical systems and quantum matter.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.