Paper detail

Logarithmic Sobolev inequalities and spectral concentration for the cubic Schrödinger equation

The nonlinear Schrödinger equation NLSE(p, β), -iu_t=-u_{xx}+β| u|^{p-2} u=0, arises from a Hamiltonian on infinite-dimensional phase space \Lp^2(\mT). For p\leq 6, Bourgain (Comm. Math. Phys. 166 (1994), 1--26) has shown that there exists a Gibbs measure μ^β_N on balls Ω_N= {ϕ\in \Lp^2(\mT) : | ϕ|^2_{\Lp^2} \leq N} in phase space such that the Cauchy problem for NLSE(p,β) is well posed on the support of μ^β_N, and that μ^β_N is invariant under the flow. This paper shows that μ^β_N satisfies a logarithmic Sobolev inequality for the focussing case β<0 and 2\leq p\leq 4 on Ω_N for all N>0; also μ^β satisfies a restricted LSI for 4\leq p\leq 6 on compact subsets of Ω_N determined by Hölder norms. Hence for p=4, the spectral data of the periodic Dirac operator in \Lp^2(\mT; \mC^2) with random potential ϕsubject to μ^β_N are concentrated near to their mean values. The paper concludes with a similar result for the spectral data of Hill's equation when the potential is random and subject to the Gibbs measure of KdV.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.