Paper detail

Log-Poisson Non-Gaussianity of Ly$α$ Transmitted Flux Fluctuations at High Redshift

We investigate the non-Gaussian features of the IGM at redshift $z\sim 5 - 6$ using Ly$α$ transmitted flux of quasar absorption spectra and cosmological hydrodynamic simulation of the concordance $Λ$CDM universe. We show that the neutral hydrogen mass density field and Ly$α$ transmitted flux fluctuations possess all the non-Gaussian features predicted by the log-Poisson hierarchy, which depends only on two dimensionless parameters $β$ and $γ$, describing, respectively, the intermittence and singularity of the random fields. We find that the non-Gaussianity of the Ly$α$ transmitted flux of quasars from $z=4.9$ to $z=6.3$ can be well reconstructed by the hydrodynamical simulation samples. Although the Gunn-Peterson optical depth and its variance underwent a significant evolution in the redshift range of $5 - 6$, the intermittency measured by $β$ is almost redshift-independent in this range. More interesting, the intermittency of quasar's absorption spectra on physical scales $0.1-1$ h$^{-1}$Mpc in redshift $5 - 6$ are found to be about the same as that on physical scales $1-10$ h$^{-1}$Mpc at redshifts $2 - 4$. Considering the Jeans length is less than 0.1 h$^{-1}$Mpc at $z\sim 5$, and $1$ h$^{-1}$Mpc at $z\sim 2$, these results imply that the nonlinear evolution in high and low redshifts will lead the cosmic baryon fluid to a state similar to fully developed turbulence. The log-Poisson high order behavior of current high redshift data of quasar's spectrum can be explained by uniform UV background in the redshift range considered. We also studied the log-Poisson non-Gaussianity by considering inhomogeneous background. With several simplified models of inhomogeneous background, we found the effect of the inhomogeneous background on the log-Poisson non-Gaussianity is not larger than 1-sigma.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.