Paper detail

LoCuSS: Hydrostatic Mass Measurements of the High-$L_X$ Cluster Sample -- Cross-calibration of Chandra and XMM-Newton

We present a consistent analysis of Chandra and XMM-Newton observations of an approximately mass-selected sample of 50 galaxy clusters at $0.15<z<0.3$ -- the "LoCuSS High-$L_X$ Sample". We apply the same analysis methods to data from both satellites, including newly developed analytic background models that predict the spatial variation of the Chandra and XMM-Newton backgrounds to $<2\%$ and $<5\%$ precision respectively. To verify the cross-calibration of Chandra and XMM-Newton-based cluster mass measurements, we derive the mass profiles of the 21 clusters that have been observed with both satellites, extracting surface brightness and temperature profiles from identical regions of the respective datasets. We obtain consistent results for the gas and total hydrostatic cluster masses: the average ratio of Chandra- to XMM-Newton-based measurements of $M_{\rm gas}$ and $M_X$ at $r_{500}$ are $0.99\pm0.02$ and $1.02\pm0.05$, respectively with an intrinsic scatter of $\sim3\%$ for gas masses and $\sim8\%$ for hydrostatic masses. Comparison of our hydrostatic mass measurements at $r_{500}$ with the latest LoCuSS weak-lensing results indicate that the data are consistent with non-thermal pressure support at this radius of $\sim7\%$. We also investigate the scaling relation between our hydrostatic cluster masses and published integrated Compton parameter $Y_{sph}$ measurements from the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Array. We measure a scatter in mass at fixed $Y_{sph}$ of $\sim16\%$ at $Δ=500$, which is consistent with theoretical predictions of $\sim10-15\%$ scatter.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.