Paper detail

LoCuSS: A Dynamical Analysis of X-ray AGN in Local Clusters

We present a study of the distribution of X-ray AGN in a representative sample of 26 massive clusters at 0.15<z<0.30, combining Chandra observations with highly complete spectroscopy of cluster members down to M_K*+2. In total we identify 48 X-ray AGN among the cluster members, with luminosities 2x10^41-1x10^44erg/s. In the stacked caustic diagram, the X-ray AGN appear to preferentially lie along the caustics, suggestive of an infalling population. They also appear to avoid the region with lowest cluster-centric radii and relative velocities (r_proj<0.4 r_500; |v-<v>|/sigma_v<0.8), which is dominated by the virialized population of galaxies accreted earliest into the clusters. Moreover the velocity dispersion of the 48 X-ray AGN is 1.51x that of the overall cluster population, which is consistent with the sqrt(2) ratio expected by simple energetic arguments when comparing infalling versus virialized populations. This kinematic segregation is significant at the 4.66-sigma level. When splitting the X-ray AGN sample into two according to X-ray or infrared (IR) luminosity, both X-ray bright and IR-bright sub-samples show higher velocity dispersions than their X-ray dim and IR-dim counterparts at >2sigma significance. This is consistent with the nuclear activity responsible for the X-ray and IR emission being slowly shut down as the host galaxies are accreted into the cluster. Overall our results provide the strongest observational evidence to date that X-ray AGN found in massive clusters are an infalling population, and that the cluster environment very effectively suppresses radiatively-efficient nuclear activity in its member galaxies. These results are consistent with the view that for galaxies to host an X-ray AGN they should be the central galaxy within their dark matter halo and have a ready supply of cold gas.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access10 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.