Paper detail

Locality-Sensitive Hashing without False Negatives for l_p

In this paper, we show a construction of locality-sensitive hash functions without false negatives, i.e., which ensure collision for every pair of points within a given radius $R$ in $d$ dimensional space equipped with $l_p$ norm when $p \in [1,\infty]$. Furthermore, we show how to use these hash functions to solve the $c$-approximate nearest neighbor search problem without false negatives. Namely, if there is a point at distance $R$, we will certainly report it and points at distance greater than $cR$ will not be reported for $c=Ω(\sqrt{d},d^{1-\frac{1}{p}})$. The constructed algorithms work: - with preprocessing time $\mathcal{O}(n \log(n))$ and sublinear expected query time, - with preprocessing time $\mathcal{O}(\mathrm{poly}(n))$ and expected query time $\mathcal{O}(\log(n))$. Our paper reports progress on answering the open problem presented by Pagh [8] who considered the nearest neighbor search without false negatives for the Hamming distance.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.