Paper detail

Local well-posedness for quadratic Schrödinger equations in $\mathbf{R^{1+1}}$: a normal form approach

For the Schrödinger equation $u_t+i u_{xx}=\nab^\be[u^2]$, $\be\in (0,1/2)$, we establish local well-posedness in $H^{\be-1+}$ (note that if $\be=0$, this matches, up to an endpoint, the sharp result of Bejenaru-Tao, \cite{BT}). Our approach differs significantly from the previous ones in that we use normal form transformation to analyze the worst interacting terms in the nonlinearity and then show that the remaining terms are (much) smoother. In particular, this allows us to conclude that $u-e^{-i t \p_x^2} u(0)\in H^{-\f{1}{2}}(\rone)$, even though $u(0)\in H^{\be-1+}$. In addition and as a byproduct of our normal form analysis, we obtain a Lipschitz continuity property in $H^{-\f{1}{2}}$ of the solution operator (which originally acts on $H^{\be-1+}$), which is new even in the case $\be=0$. As an easy corollary, we obtain local well-posedness results for $u_t+ i u_{xx} = [\nab^β u]^2$. Finally, we sketch an approach to obtain similar statements for the equations $u_t+i u_{xx}=\nab^\be[u\bar{u}]$ and $u_t+i u_{xx}=\nab^\be[\bar{u}^2]$.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.