Paper detail

Local universality of zeroes of random polynomials

In this paper, we establish some local universality results concerning the correlation functions of the zeroes of random polynomials with independent coefficients. More precisely, consider two random polynomials $f =\sum_{i=1}^n c_i ξ_i z^i$ and $\tilde f =\sum_{i=1}^n c_i \tilde ξ_i z^i$, where the $ξ_i$ and $\tilde ξ_i$ are iid random variables that match moments to second order, the coefficients $c_i$ are deterministic, and the degree parameter $n$ is large. Our results show, under some light conditions on the coefficients $c_i$ and the tails of $ξ_i, \tilde ξ_i$, that the correlation functions of the zeroes of $f$ and $\tilde f$ are approximately the same. As an application, we give some answers to the classical question `"How many zeroes of a random polynomials are real?" for several classes of random polynomial models. Our analysis relies on a general replacement principle, motivated by some recent work in random matrix theory. This principle enables one to compare the correlation functions of two random functions $f$ and $\tilde f$ if their log magnitudes $\log |f|, \log|\tilde f|$ are close in distribution, and if some non-concentration bounds are obeyed.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.