Paper detail

Local Redesigning of Airspace Sectors

In this paper we study the Airspace Sectorization Problem (ASP) where the goal is to find an optimal partition (sectorization) of the airspace into a certain number of sectors, each managed by an air traffic controller. The objective of the ASP is to find a "well-balanced" sectorization that distributes the workload evenly among the controllers. We formulate the ASP as a partitioning problem of a set of moving points in a polygonal domain. In addition to the requirement of balancing the workload, we introduce restrictions on the geometry of the sectorization which come from the Air Traffic Management aspects. We investigate several versions of the problem that arise from different definitions of the notion of the workload and various choices of geometric restrictions on the sectorization. We conclude that most of the formulations of the problem, except maybe in some trivial cases, are NP-hard. Finally, we propose a Local Redesigning Method (LRM), a heuristic algorithm that rebalances a given sectorization by adjusting the boundaries of the sectors. We evaluate LRM experimentally on synthetically generated scenarios as well as on the real historical traffic data. We demonstrate that the sectorizations produced by our method are superior in comparison with the current sectorizations of the US airspace.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.