Paper detail

Local limit theorems for subgraph counts

We introduce a general framework for studying anticoncentration and local limit theorems for random variables, including graph statistics. Our methods involve an interplay between Fourier analysis, decoupling, hypercontractivity of Boolean functions, and transference between ``fixed-size'' and ``independent'' models. We also adapt a notion of ``graph factors'' due to Janson. As a consequence, we derive a local central limit theorem for connected subgraph counts in the Erdős-Renyi random graph $G(n,p)$, building on work of Gilmer and Kopparty and of Berkowitz. These results improve an anticoncentration result of Fox, Kwan, and Sauermann and partially answers a question of Fox, Kwan, and Sauermann. We also derive a local limit central limit theorem for induced subgraph counts, as long as $p$ is bounded away from a set of ``problematic'' densities, partially answering a question of Fox, Kwan, and Sauermann. We then prove these restrictions are necessary by exhibiting a disconnected graph for which anticoncentration for subgraph counts at the optimal scale fails for all constant $p$, and finding a graph $H$ for which anticoncentration for induced subgraph counts fails in $G(n,1/2)$. These counterexamples resolve anticoncentration conjectures of Fox, Kwan, and Sauermann in the negative. Finally, we also examine the behavior of counts of $k$-term arithmetic progressions in subsets of $\mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z}$ and deduce a local limit theorem wherein the behavior is Gaussian at a global scale but has nontrivial local oscillations (according to a Ramanujan theta function). These results improve on results of and answer questions of the authors and Berkowitz, and answer a question of Fox, Kwan, and Sauermann.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.