Paper detail

Local Improvement Gives Better Expanders

It has long been known that random regular graphs are with high probability good expanders. This was first established in the 1980s by Bollobás by directly calculating the probability that a set of vertices has small expansion and then applying the union bound. In this paper we improve on this analysis by relying on a simple high-level observation: if a graph contains a set of vertices with small expansion then it must also contain such a set of vertices that is locally optimal, that is, a set whose expansion cannot be made smaller by exchanging a vertex from the set with one from the set's complement. We show that the probability that a set of vertices satisfies this additional property is significantly smaller. Thus, after again applying the union bound, we obtain improved lower bounds on the expansion of random $Δ$-regular graphs for $Δ\ge 4$. In fact, the gains from this analysis increase as $Δ$ grows, a fact we explain by extending our technique to general $Δ$. Thus, in the end we obtain an improvement not only for some small special cases but on the general asymptotic bound on the expansion of $Δ$-regular graphs given by Bollobás.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.