Paper detail

Local Group Analogs in $Λ$CDM cosmological simulations

We use semi-analytic galaxy catalogs based on two high-resolution cosmological $N$-body simulations, Millennium-WMAP7 and Millennium-II, to investigate the formation of the Local Group (LG) analogs. Unlike previous studies, we use the observed stellar masses to select the LG member (Milky Way (MW) and M31) analogs, and then impose constrains using the observed separation, isolation, and kinematics of the two main member galaxies. By comparing radial and low-ellipticity orbits between the MW and M31, we find higher tangential velocity results in higher total mass, which are 4.4$^{+2.4}_{-1.5}\times$10$^{12}\rm M_{\odot}$ and 6.6$^{+2.7}_{-1.5}\times$10$^{12}\rm M_{\odot}$ for radial and low-ellipticity orbits. The orbits also influence the individual mass distribution of MW and M31 analogs. For radial orbits, the typical host halo masses of the MW and M31 are 1.5$^{+1.4}_{-0.7}\times$10$^{12}\rm M_{\odot}$ and 2.5$^{+1.3}_{-1.1}\times$10$^{12}\rm M_{\odot}$; for low-ellipticity orbits, the masses are 2.5$^{+2.2}_{-1.4}\times$10$^{12}\rm M_{\odot}$ and 3.8$^{+2.8}_{-1.8}\times$10$^{12} \rm M_{\odot}$. The LG is located primarily in filaments with tails extending toward higher densities up to $δ\sim4.5$. The dark matter velocity anisotropy parameters $β$ of both the MW and M31 analogs are close to zero in the center, increasing to 0.2--0.3 at 50--80 kpc and decreasing slowly outward. The slope is much flatter than computed from the MW satellites, and the amplitude is smaller than traced by halo stars. Values of $β$ from different tracers agree at $\sim$120 kpc where $β\sim$ 0.2. We also find that model predictions agree broadly with observations in the radial distribution and luminosity function of satellites around the MW and M31.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.