Paper detail

Local cosmological effects of the order of H in the orbital motion of a binary system

A two-body system hypothetically affected by an additional radial acceleration H v_r, where v_r is the radial velocity of the binary's proper orbital motion, would experience long-term temporal changes of both its semimajor axis a and the eccentricity e qualitatively different from any other standard competing effect for them. Contrary to what one might reasonably expect, the analytical expressions of such rates do not vanish in the limit M--> 0, where M is the mass of the primary, being independent of it. This is a general requirement that any potentially viable physical mechanism able to provide such a putative acceleration should meet. Nonetheless, if H had the same value H_0 of the Hubble parameter at present epoch, such rates of change would have magnitude close to the present-day level of accuracy in determining planetary orbital motions in our Solar System. A tension with recent observations may even be present for Mercury and Mars. However, general relativity, applied to a localized gravitationally bound binary system immersed in an expanding Friedmann-Lemaitre-Robertson-Walker, does not predict the existence of such a putative radial acceleration at Newtonian level. Instead, it was recently shown in literature that an acceleration of order H and directed along the velocity v of the test particle occurs at post-Newtonian level. We worked out its orbital effects finding well-behaved secular rates of change for both a and e proportional to the Schwarzschild radius r_s of the primary. Their magnitude is quite small: the rate of change of a amounts to just 20 microns per century in our Solar System. Finally, we discussed certain basic criteria of viability that modified models of gravity should generally meet when their observable effects are calculated.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.