Paper detail

Local correlation clustering

Correlation clustering is perhaps the most natural formulation of clustering. Given $n$ objects and a pairwise similarity measure, the goal is to cluster the objects so that, to the best possible extent, similar objects are put in the same cluster and dissimilar objects are put in different clusters. Despite its theoretical appeal, the practical relevance of correlation clustering still remains largely unexplored, mainly due to the fact that correlation clustering requires the $Θ(n^2)$ pairwise similarities as input. In this paper we initiate the investigation into \emph{local} algorithms for correlation clustering. In \emph{local correlation clustering} we are given the identifier of a single object and we want to return the cluster to which it belongs in some globally consistent near-optimal clustering, using a small number of similarity queries. Local algorithms for correlation clustering open the door to \emph{sublinear-time} algorithms, which are particularly useful when the similarity between items is costly to compute, as it is often the case in many practical application domains. They also imply $(i)$ distributed and streaming clustering algorithms, $(ii)$ constant-time estimators and testers for cluster edit distance, and $(iii)$ property-preserving parallel reconstruction algorithms for clusterability. Specifically, we devise a local clustering algorithm attaining a $(3, \varepsilon)$-approximation in time $O(1/\varepsilon^2)$ independently of the dataset size. An explicit approximate clustering for all objects can be produced in time $O(n/\varepsilon)$ (which is provably optimal). We also provide a fully additive $(1,\varepsilon)$-approximation with local query complexity $poly(1/\varepsilon)$ and time complexity $2^{poly(1/\varepsilon)}$. The latter yields the fastest polynomial-time approximation scheme for correlation clustering known to date.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.