Paper detail

Local aspects of the Sidorenko property for linear equations

A system of linear equations in $\mathbb{F}_p^n$ is \textit{Sidorenko} if any subset of $\mathbb{F}_p^n$ contains at least as many solutions to the system as a random set of the same density, asymptotically as $n\to \infty$. A system of linear equations is \textit{common} if any 2-colouring of $\mathbb{F}_p^n$ yields at least as many monochromatic solutions to the system of equations as a random 2-colouring, asymptotically as $n\to \infty$. Both classification problems remain wide open despite recent attention. We show that a certain generic family of systems of two linear equations is not Sidorenko. In fact, we show that systems in this family are not locally Sidorenko, and that systems in this family which do not contain additive tuples are not weakly locally Sidorenko. This endeavour answers a conjecture and question of Kamčev--Liebenau--Morrison. Insofar as methods, we observe that the true complexity of a linear system is not maintained under Fourier inversion; our main novelty is the use of higher-order methods in the frequency space of systems which have complexity one. We also give a shorter proof of the recent result of Kamčev--Liebenau--Morrison and independently Versteegen that any linear system containing a four term arithmetic progression is uncommon.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.