Paper detail

Load Balancing Under Strict Compatibility Constraints

We study large-scale systems operating under the JSQ$(d)$ policy in the presence of stringent task-server compatibility constraints. Consider a system with $N$ identical single-server queues and $M(N)$ task types, where each server is able to process only a small subset of possible task types. Each arriving task selects $d\geq 2$ random servers compatible to its type, and joins the shortest queue among them. The compatibility constraint is naturally captured by a fixed bipartite graph $G_N$ between the servers and the task types. When $G_N$ is complete bipartite, the meanfield approximation is proven to be accurate. However, such dense compatibility graphs are infeasible due to their overwhelming implementation cost and prohibitive storage capacity requirement at the servers. Our goal in this paper is to characterize the class of sparse compatibility graphs for which the meanfield approximation remains valid. To achieve this, first, we introduce a novel graph expansion-based notion, called proportional sparsity, and establish that systems with proportionally sparse compatibility graphs match the performance of a fully flexible system, asymptotically in the large-system limit. Furthermore, for any $c(N)$ satisfying $$\frac{Nc(N)}{M(N)\ln(N)}\to \infty\quad \text{and}\quad c(N)\to \infty,$$ as $N\to\infty$, we show that proportionally sparse random compatibility graphs can be designed, so that the degree of each server is at most $c(N)$. This reduces the server-degree almost by a factor $N/\ln(N)$, compared to the complete bipartite compatibility graph, while maintaining the same asymptotic performance. Extensive simulation experiments are conducted to corroborate the theoretical results.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.