Paper detail

LMKG: Learned Models for Cardinality Estimation in Knowledge Graphs

Accurate cardinality estimates are a key ingredient to achieve optimal query plans. For RDF engines, specifically under common knowledge graph processing workloads, the lack of schema, correlated predicates, and various types of queries involving multiple joins, render cardinality estimation a particularly challenging task. In this paper, we develop a framework, termed LMKG, that adopts deep learning approaches for effectively estimating the cardinality of queries over RDF graphs. We employ both supervised (i.e., deep neural networks) and unsupervised (i.e., autoregressive models) approaches that adapt to the subgraph patterns and produce more accurate cardinality estimates. To feed the underlying data to the models, we put forward a novel encoding that represents the queries as subgraph patterns. Through extensive experiments on both real-world and synthetic datasets, we evaluate our models and show that they overall outperform the state-of-the-art approaches in terms of accuracy and execution time.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.