Paper detail

Live Fast, Die $α$-Enhanced: The Mass-Metallicity-$α$ Relation of the Milky Way's Disrupted Dwarf Galaxies

The Milky Way's satellite galaxies ("surviving dwarfs") have been studied for decades as unique probes of chemical evolution in the low-mass regime. Here we extend such studies to the "disrupted dwarfs", whose debris constitutes the stellar halo. We present abundances ([Fe/H], [$α$/Fe]) and stellar masses for nine disrupted dwarfs with $M_{\star}\approx10^{6}-10^{9}M_{\odot}$ from the H3 Survey (Sagittarius, $Gaia$-Sausage-Enceladus, Helmi Streams, Sequoia, Wukong/LMS-1, Cetus, Thamnos, I'itoi, Orphan/Chenab). The surviving and disrupted dwarfs are chemically distinct: at fixed mass, the disrupted dwarfs are systematically metal-poor and $α$-enhanced. The disrupted dwarfs define a mass-metallicity relation (MZR) with a similar slope as the $z=0$ MZR followed by the surviving dwarfs, but offset to lower metallicities by $Δ$[Fe/H]$\approx0.3-0.4$ dex. Dwarfs with larger offsets from the $z=0$ MZR are more $α$-enhanced. In simulations as well as observations, galaxies with higher $Δ$[Fe/H] formed at higher redshifts -- exploiting this, we infer the disrupted dwarfs have typical star-formation truncation redshifts of $z_{\rm{trunc}}{\sim}1-2$. We compare the chemically inferred $z_{\rm{trunc}}$ with dynamically inferred accretion redshifts and find almost all dwarfs are quenched only after accretion. The differences between disrupted and surviving dwarfs are likely because the disrupted dwarfs assembled their mass rapidly, at higher redshifts, and within denser dark matter halos that formed closer to the Galaxy. Our results place novel archaeological constraints on low-mass galaxies inaccessible to direct high-$z$ studies: (i) the redshift evolution of the MZR along parallel tracks but offset to lower metallicities extends to $M_{\star}\approx10^{6}-10^{9}M_{\odot}$; (ii) galaxies at $z\approx2-3$ are $α$-enhanced with [$α$/Fe]$\approx0.4$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access12 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.