Paper detail

LIV Dimensional Regularization and Quantum Gravity effects in the Standard Model

Recently, we have remarked that the main effect of Quantum Gravity(QG) will be to modify the measure of integration of loop integrals in a renormalizable Quantum Field Theory. In the Standard Model this approach leads to definite predictions, depending on only one arbitrary parameter. In particular, we found that the maximal attainable velocity for particles is not the speed of light, but depends on the specific couplings of the particles within the Standard Model. Also birrefringence occurs for charged leptons, but not for gauge bosons. Our predictions could be tested in the next generation of neutrino detectors such as NUBE. In this paper, we elaborate more on this proposal. In particular, we extend the dimensional regularization prescription to include Lorentz invariance violations(LIV) of the measure, preserving gauge invariance. Then we comment on the consistency of our proposal.

preprint2005arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.